Personal

Stewardship Rights and Two Unsung Heroes of the North Bay Fires

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fires are out, most of the ash and soot is being washed away by the rains, and except for the unluckiest of us, life in Santa Rosa is getting back to normal.

But not for me. For me there were too many important lessons to be learned and the tuition too expensive for me not to pay attention. You see, even though my house survived, the fires have permanently destroyed many of the illusions I had about safety, “property rights” and even about the basic nature of who we are (and can be) as humans

On the Sunday afternoon before the fires I went for a walk with my friend Sheila and we had a fascinating, albeit highly theoretical, discussion about reframing “property rights” as “stewardship rights”. Her view was that the frighteningly fast descent of our species might be slowed down a bit if we could make that conceptual shift when it comes to the earth and all the resources we are in the process of wrecking and rendering useless for future generations. She was totally convincing and with that perspective in mind, I headed off to my men’s book club that evening where we, a group of well-intentioned late middle aged rich white guys, sat around discussing “Evicted”, a heartbreaking book about how impossibly difficult it is becoming for the bottom 10% of America to keep a roof over their heads. To varying degrees we shared our collective and individual shame about having so much, and even more importantly, about how we are contributing to the problem through our current and intended investments in rental real estate.

That night I went to bed with a feeling of deep unease about my contribution to the mess we are in and the even deeper feeling that a few “mea culpa’s” with fellow perpetrators sharing white wine in a comfortable house in San Francisco would not make the situation any better. Nevertheless I slept too well and got up ready to drive up north to take care of some maintenance on our property that is situated just outside of Santa Rosa on the way to Hood Mountain. It is both a second home and an investment, and despite all the talk of the night before, I wasn’t feeling the least bit guilty as I began to pack.

However, as soon as I turned on my computer to check the news, it was clear that I was going nowhere that day. For the next few hours I tried to get as much information as I could on what was going on. We have 8.5 acres and two houses there – a magical place with a year round creek, about 50 fruit trees and an acre of grapes. It’s a sanctuary in the truest sense of the word and to know that it might suddenly cease to exist (or at least be transformed beyond all recognition) hit me hard and in unexpected places. Around noon I got a text from the tenant of the house we rent out who said that he, his partner and their cat had evacuated and were in Sebastapol. This is a tenant with whom I had been fighting with for a while (over noise and boundaries between his space and ours). I hadn’t spoken to him in a month, but when I heard from him, I was truly glad he was safe, and he was glad that I was glad. For a moment, we were not landlord and tenant, but rather just two human beings caught in the chaos of life. It felt painful, but good.

The rest of the afternoon I spent obsessively tracking the progress of the flames and witnessing the horrifying destruction in north Santa Rosa where I used to go for supplies and groceries. Throughout the day I received many texts and e-mails from friends and colleagues who knew about our place and how in peril it was. It was wonderful to know how many people cared, but it was when I got the only phone call of the day that I really learned what I needed to learn. It came from Jorge, a man who until that phone call I would not have called either a friend or a colleague.

Jorge is a day laborer who has done a lot of work for me and my neighbors at the property. I got introduced to him a few years ago by the retired teamster (and Trump voter) who lives across the creek. He introduced him to me as “George, a helluva worker and a helluva good guy”. Since then Jorge has done a number of jobs for me and we have even worked together on some particularly dirty two man jobs where no other workers were available. I’m ashamed to say that in all that time, I’ve learned very little about Jorge’s life. I know he came here from Mexico almost 30 years ago and has worked on properties throughout the area for almost all of that time. I also know that he has a wife and a 7 year old son born here in the US and that in order to be close to his jobs and to make ends meet, Jorge rented a tiny place in North Santa Rosa, while his wife works with her cousins 6 months of the year picking strawberries in Watsonville; 12 hours a day 6 days a week. Through pure random luck (actually to celebrate his son’s birthday), Jorge had driven down on to Watsonville on Friday so the family could celebrate together. It was there that he learned about the fire that had consumed his neighborhood in Santa Rosa and was threatening the houses of many of the property owners that he had worked for over the years.

He called me because he wanted to know if I was ok and had escaped the fire. In fact he had spent the day calling everyone he knew to check on them. From him I learned about the 90 year old couple next door (ok as they were picked up by their son), and others who were not so lucky. The one person he couldn’t reach was our neighbor Mark who, we both speculated, was still at his property ready to fight the fire and defend his property all by himself. It would be almost 2 weeks before I found out the full story of what happened to him and some of my other neighbors during the event, but for the moment I was just completely absorbed in what Jorge was telling me. It almost brought tears to my eyes to listen to this man, who, even though he didn’t know me well and though he had likely lost most of the few possessions he had, was reaching out with open hearted compassion and interest to find out what was happening to me and my family, wanting to pass on any bits of information that he knew that might in some way help me deal with my problems. But beyond his selflessness, the thing that struck me right to the core was how much joy and gratitude he was exuding. He was with his family and they were safe. It was all he needed for himself, and now he was showing me the best of what we can be as human beings. He was a beam of bright light on a very dark day.

Over the next few days the news got worse, then better, and then much worse. Over 20 separate fires had broken out across the North Bay and two of the major ones (the Tubbs and Nuns Fires) began converging on our property, kept away only by the fickle wind and the almost superhuman efforts of the Cal Fire crews. The roads throughout the area were closed and rumors began circulating that looting of evacuated but still standing houses had begun. As my cell phone continuously beeped with emergency updates from the Sonoma County sheriff, I thought that maybe this really is our future; little pockets of hell springing up all around the country eventually converging and combining into one final conflagration, but against all reason, knowing there are people like Jorge and the firemen putting their lives on the line for the rest of us, I couldn’t help but feel some hope.

For over a week the battles raged with ground gained and lost, and unlike wars of the past, it was possible to follow the flames by satellite and internet. Just when it seemed that the worst was over, that Cal Fire was gaining the upper hand on the two main fires threatening our houses, a new fire broke out near the Oakmont retirement community just 2 miles down the road from our place. Things now looked very bad. The fires raced up the hills just to the south of us and Hood Mountain itself was on fire. The flames were now coming down the hillside toward the Creek where one of our houses is situated and on whose banks we have spent countless summer hours enjoying its coolness and winter nights listening to the roaring water just outside our bedroom window.

And then suddenly it was over. Just 500 yards from the properties on the other side of the creek, the fires were stopped. It took another day for Cal Fire to secure the line and two days of rain to douse the hotspots and cleanse the air sufficiently to allow property owners to return to their homes. And so on Saturday October 21, I prepared myself to drive up to Santa Rosa to see first hand what had become of our second home.

 

AFTERMATH

 

Almost exactly two weeks after the fires began, I returned to Santa Rosa to see what remained. As soon as I got off the highway and headed east toward our property, I got my first shock. The Sonoma County fairgrounds, a normally empty and expansive network of fields and barns had become a refugee camp, with wandering homeless, tents, medical stations as well as police and military vehicles strewn as far as the eye could see. All along the road back to my property were signs and flowers, mostly thanking the firefighters and other first responders, but also some expressing gratitude or grief – for what was lost and for what still remained.

At the corner of our street was this sign, typical of the sentiment welcoming me back home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My relief and gratitude were tempered somewhat, however, when I turned onto the road and saw that on the back of the sign was another message that had been left by my neighbors who had evacuated several days earlier.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I drove up the road and saw that while our houses had survived, they were not untouched. In fact Cal Fire had used our property as a back up staging area, prepared to fight the fire from the steps of our house if it had gotten as far as the creek running past the property. Even though the battle had been won, the firemen had clearly left in haste; leaving axes, firehoses and much debris as well as broken fences, gates and doors in their wake. As I surveyed the scene I was filled with an undigestible mix of deep gratitude for the brave men and women who saved our property, dread at how close the fires had come, discouragement at the amount of effort it was going to take to clean up the mess and just a tinge of survivor’s guilt when I compared my problems to the vast scale of the destruction throughout the City that will take years to recover from. It was a truly disorienting moment.

To ground myself, I walked across the creek to visit Mark who I found helping one of his tenants rewire another tenant’s pick-up truck. As I mentioned, Mark is the retired teamster Trump voter who is my closest neighbor. He has a similarly sized property to ours, only his is crowded with a motley collection of structures, vehicles, dogs and tenants inhabiting it. He himself lives with his wife in a small apartment attached to the back of a 2000 square foot Quonset Hut filled to the brim with tools (power and otherwise) used appliances, and semi-serious construction equipment. He is a unique individual in more ways than one and among other things is our resident historian having been married for 55 years to the granddaughter of one of the original residents who settled the area.

The history of Mark’s property as well as that of most of the neighbors up the hill towards Hood Mountain is full of intrigue, quirky characters and real Wild West drama. To this day Mark feels that he was cheated out of his fair share of the 500 acre plot up the hill that his wife’s grandfather owned and in whose house she lived as a child. It’s a story I’ve heard at least a dozen times, but one that seems to change in detail with each retelling. The only constant is that at some point there was a rigged property auction held by a crooked judge after the old man died and in the ensuing court battle Mark and his wife only came away with the 6 acres by the Creek that they still live on.

Knowing Mark, and having it now confirmed that he never evacuated when the fires came,  I was anxious to hear his story. I was fully expecting to hear a harrowing tale of what he witnessed punctuated by his justification for refusing to follow the order to evacuate and a rant about how no government authority could tell him to leave the property that he fought so hard to get and keep over so many years.

But instead I was surprised by what he had to tell me, and like Jorge, I realized that Mark was not at all the man I had thought he was.

It seems that Mark knew all too well the risk he was taking but he didn’t hesitate for a moment in deciding to stay. Because in addition to knowing the risk, he also knew that by staying he could make a real difference – not just in saving his own property, but in helping the firefighters  save his neighbors’ homes and to help them stay safe as possible while doing so. So he acted; immediately and with purpose. He first made sure that his wife, his tenants and all their pets were safely evacuated, shuttling some himself down to the local Safeway where buses were available to take them out of harm’s way. Then he went back to the property and welcomed Cal Fire equipment and volunteers (some of whom had come in from distant states and were completely unfamiliar with the geography) to his home and proceeded to serve as guide, host and advisor for the next few days.

When I listened to his account of what happened, I was immediately struck that the narrative did not have the usual bluster, humor or “us vs them” quality that I had come to expect from his stories. Rather it was a story of a band of warriors who had fought and defeated a fearsome and lethal enemy, of an army that he felt honored to be a part of. He had a quiet pride about the fact that his extensive knowledge of the terrain as well as the resources he had built on the property – the multiple outlets to his well and water storage tanks, the generator that provided electricity, the food supplies he had stocked for just such an eventuality all had proven invaluable. He was too old now to be on the frontlines, with the chainsaws and the hoses, but he had acted with the same selfless sense of duty and love for the land and its inhabitants, and now he was basking in the glow of having successfully defended the homefront.

So in the end, what are “property rights” and how do you get them? Is it a recorded deed in some County Clerk’s office? Is it something that you buy with money or obtain with power or blood? Or is it something more elemental, and something that you have to earn, defend, and then deserve? I really don’t know the answer anymore.

When I think about the love of the land and his neighbors that both Jorge and Mark showed me in the last month it makes me reexamine my own relationship to that beautiful 8.5 acres that I used to think of as “mine” and the community which it is a part of. My family feels that our place is “too much work”, that the area will never be the same, and what we should do is sell our property to someone else who will be a better “steward” of the land. I am not at all sure they are wrong, but whatever we do, we will do it with heart and a recognition that a place is much more than a spot on a map or a Title and a bank account.

 

Memories, Dream Recording and the Present Value of “Stuff”

In my last post, I talked about my son’s consideration of the colleges he might want to go to. That is a decision that he will have to face largely by himself. However, the fact that he will be leaving my wife and me with an “empty nest” has brought us a whole new set of decisions to face, one of which I want to talk about today.

Whatever we decide to do after Adam leaves home, it will almost certainly entail moving to a smaller space. The process of deciding where to live and what to do with the “rest of our life” is obviously another type of Present Value decision and one that I will write about again in future posts, but given that we know that whatever path we choose to take, we will have less space for all of our accumulated possessions, there is really no reason to wait on an important related decision – i.e. what do we do with all our “stuff”?

The “Dream Recorder”

And so, this weekend we started in on our storage shed; the one in the backyard which over the years has become the repository for almost everything that we don’t use, but can’t bear to part with – old toys, photos, school papers, artwork (both Adam’s and ours), comic books, baseball cards, an array of almost useful tools and a vast store of memorabilia filled with magic, associations and significance.

As I started bringing everything out, examining and sorting it into categories (definitely toss, definitely keep and several categories in between) I came across one of Adam’s early creations – the “dream recorder”. He built it when he was 5 years old out of scrap wood, nails and magic markers. Primitive as it is the resemblance to a VCR is unmistakable and, as he had explained to me more than 10 years earlier, that is what it was supposed to be, only instead of plugging it into the TV or a video camera, you plugged it into your head before you went to sleep and after setting the dials appropriately your dreams were recorded and available for playback anytime you wished. This one, despite its bulk, was an unquestionable “keeper”. I didn’t even think about using Present Value; the “Dream Recorder’s” importance and “value” (to me, to Adam, now and in the future) was simply too high to consider the small incremental space savings that we would gain by discarding it. If nothing else, its continued presence in our lives reminds me of just how valuable our dreams and our memories really are.

But what about the rest of the stuff? How would we decide what to keep, sell, give away or discard? And in making those decisions, when should we use Present Value and when should we just go with our first basic instinct? I don’t have space to go into the details of each and every decision, but I do want to talk about one example that may be familiar to those of you who can still remember Ed Sullivan, mini-skirts, and the “British Invasion”.

Albums – The soundtrack to growing up

Unlike baseball cards and old coins, records take up a lot of space. They are also a funny kind of collectible. Of course they bring back all sorts of memories, and many of them have significant investment value, but they also (at least theoretically) can still be played and enjoyed for what they were intended to provide – music to listen to and enjoy. So deciding what to do with our record collection of 500 LP’s as well as the decent turntable that was carefully stored alongside them was a decision that was both complicated and would be of some spatial significance.

Beyond the obvious problem of placing a value on the future pleasure we would get from seeing these albums years from now and recalling the teenage good times associated with them, the really hard part of using Present Value for this decision was steps 2 and 3—imagining possible futures and evaluating their likelihood. As I thought more about it, I realized that to justify the expense, hassle and psychic burden of carrying around a couple hundred pounds of vinyl taking up several cubic feet of space for the rest of our lives we would need a pretty compelling vision of how we would enjoy those records and/or a financial rationale suggesting that a “hold” strategy was better (from a Present Value perspective) than to simply realize the capital gains on some of the unquestionably “savvy” investments I had made in all that “damned noise”(as many of the wise adults around me then called it) all those years ago.

The financial part of the analysis was pretty easy. Beatle records right now are at an all-time high, the market is almost frenzied, and even the records of some of the other more “minor” artists (e.g. The Who, Jimi Hendrix, Rolling Stones etc.) in the collection have been caught up in the market rise and are worth far more than the $3.99 I paid for them (let alone their depreciated value considering the dozens of times each was played). Looking ahead, it seemed to me that if we aren’t yet at a peak, we are probably close – both artists and fans are ageing fast, and those that really want to have and play those records could easily soon be facing the same kind of “space squeeze” we were. Put another way, would I be willing to pay $50 for good quality copy of “Beatles ‘65” today as an investment? And if not, selling surely is the smart move.

But, what about our future “golden years”? We have a farm with an old house up north that we are renovating and it is there, where we hope to spend a great deal of our retirement. Wouldn’t that be the perfect spot to set up the turntable, store the records and spend many a lazy summer evening playing the songs that still make us feel young? How valuable would that be, and wouldn’t the costs of temporary storage and ultimate moving expenses be a modest price to pay for such long term and exquisite pleasure? Even with a relatively high personal rate of discount, that seems, on the face of it like a more than fair trade-off.

Except, that when I really took the time to consider it, I realized that this possible future was just a fantasy and that there was virtually no chance that we would ever find a prominent place in that house (which isn’t all that big anyway) for records, a turntable (with all its accoutrements) and such an antiquated mode of playing music. We have plenty more CD’s that we still actively listen to and with streaming audio services advancing at lightening speed, even if I did get a sudden urge to listen to Iron Butterfly’s “In-a-Gadda–Da-Vida”, Spotify or some other service would be able to deliver it to me with a quick click (or maybe even a voice command). In short, this particular future should be evaluated as having a VERY small probability of being realized.

It was a sad realization, made even sadder by the fact that having the fantasy itself was a source of pleasure, and that as soon as I understood that it wasn’t going to happen, even that modest (and near term) benefit of holding on to the records disappeared. And so this weekend, the best of the lot goes up on E-Bay and those that don’t sell there, could soon be available at your local used record store.

It was an important lesson albeit not a pleasant one to absorb. Specifically, just like (even unrecorded) dreams and memories, fantasies have value too, but more often than we’d like, it makes sense, at least from a Present Value perspective, to face reality and let them go.

Relearning to Love Math – How I Became an Actuary

“You can do ANYTHING with Math.”

-Deborah Hughes Hallet to a 1st year calculus class for non math majors

Math is hard and math is scary. This is particularly true when your father is a theoretical mathematician who viewed every report card A as an opportunity to describe how what you just learned is a special case of an even more beautiful and abstract area of mathematics that is waiting just beyond your current level of comprehension. So for me, learning math as a kid resembled nothing more than being on an arduous hike in the mountains with an overly enthusiastic trail guide who rarely let you stop and enjoy the view, but instead kept pushing you to scramble up more and more challenging screes and rock faces, all with the promise of “just wait until you see what’s up ahead!”. I stuck with it through most of high school and then simply walked away. It was not until my junior year in college that I decided that Math was something I could do, would serve me well, and with my father 300 miles away, it was safe to try again.

Sometimes you get lucky, and with my reintroduction to the subject I got the best possible teacher I could have hoped for. Deborah Hughes Hallet was one of the only female professors in Harvard’s Math department, and that fact alone should have clued me in that she was something special. Originally from England with degrees from Cambridge and Harvard, she was anything but your typical tweedy academic. She was full of kinetic energy and looked like she would be much more comfortable climbing Half Dome than lecturing to a classroom full of students. She was an extraordinary teacher, whose passion was communicating her love of the subject to her students. Her explanations were clear and direct, and she gave us all the feeling that Math was not only accessible, but fun as well. Beyond that she had the uncanny knack of knowing just where the difficulty lay in each particular subject and she would take pains to address it even before the questions were asked. For the first few weeks of the class, it was smooth sailing and I wondered why I had ever abandoned the subject.

But then I hit the wall. Calculus has some deep and apparently paradoxical concepts (like instantaneous change, infinitesimal differences etc) and when I hit my first, I just froze. Needing help, I visited Professor Hallet during her office hours and within 30 seconds she cleared my conceptual block. I think we were both taken aback at how easy it was and when I showed her some willingness to hear more (something I rarely had given my father), she spent the next half hour showing me all kinds of fascinating applications and extensions of the concepts. Unlike my father, she seemed to know exactly what questions I would find interesting, and what answers I would find exciting. I left the room with a renewed enthusiasm for math that has rarely wavered in the almost 40 years since.

I went on to take one more year of calculus and a couple of other math courses in areas of interest (Geometry, Probability etc), but then faced the prospect of graduating college with no idea of what I was going to do next. I had applied to law school, but hated the prospect of more classes and no real world exposure. It was already April and I began to panic as almost everyone that I knew had a plan in place. Needing help once again, I visited with Professor Hallet and told her I was stuck and didn’t know what to do. This time she seemed a bit disappointed in me and just a little amused. She laughed a little and chided me for not paying as much attention in her class as I should have. Then she told me to simply go to the Career Services office and look up all the jobs that used math. She said there were plenty and that as math was something I loved and was good at, any job that used it, would almost by definition, be a good fit for me. It was simple but good advice. Before I even got out of the “A’s” I found listings for entry level jobs as an actuarial student. This was a job that not only used math, but would pay me to take more math tests, something that I had become particularly good at. I quickly signed up to take the first exam in May, and within weeks was hired for my first actuarial position at the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“CG”) in Bloomfield Connecticut.

In the 35 years since I started at CG I have never once regretted my decision. It is an unusual profession that has given me unique perspective to look at the financial world and Life in general. In future blog posts I will explore the actuarial viewpoint more deeply and share how that perspective can be applied to a variety of issues ranging from the mundane and individual to the most global and societal.

 I would love to get any and all feedback on what I have to say, so please feel free to comment or e-mail me. I look forward to our conversation.